CIPLA vs LASA: Stock Comparison
CIPLA is the larger company by market capitalisation. CIPLA shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage, while LASA shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CIPLA leads 9; LASA leads 2 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | Pharmaceuticals |
Price
| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,330.9 | ₹6.52 |
| Day Change | 1.29% | -2.54% |
| Volume | 6.39 L | 46,913 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,673 | ₹12.48 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,165.7 | ₹5.67 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.45% | -47.76% |
Valuation
| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1.07 L Cr | ₹27 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 31.87x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.12x | — |
| EPS | ₹41.7 | ₹-0.71 |
| Book Value | ₹426.25 | ₹9.9 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -2.1% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -54.6% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 8.84% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 44.8% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.19% | -68.7% |
| ROCE | 11.58% | -57.92% |
| Net Margin | 13.96% | -135.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.74% | -136.12% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.01x | 0.2x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CIPLA | LASA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 9.17% | 53.65% |
| FII Holding | 20.21%▼ 2.35 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 34.63%▲ 2.66 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 15.94%▼ 0.31 pp | 46.35% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CIPLA and LASA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.