CRAMC vs PINELABS: Stock Comparison
PINE LABS is the larger company by market capitalisation. CANARA ROBECO AMC shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CRAMC leads 9; PINELABS leads 3 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management Company | Financial Technology (Fintech) |
Price
| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹220.49 | ₹163.79 |
| Day Change | -2.76% | -0.76% |
| Volume | 1.7 L | 43.77 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹353.4 | ₹284 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹214.2 | ₹134.73 |
| Distance from 52W High | -37.61% | -42.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹4,403 Cr | ₹18,921 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.01x | 147.61x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.27x | 3.19x |
| EPS | ₹2.97 | ₹0.17 |
| Book Value | ₹37.4 | ₹51.09 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 2.9% | -34.3% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -1% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 4.64% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -21.71% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 27.33% | 2.36% |
| ROCE | 27.6% | 3.9% |
| Net Margin | 43.61% | 3.03% |
| Operating Margin | 65.09% | 12.94% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.04x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CRAMC | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 38% | — |
| FII Holding | 1.6%▲ 0.33 pp | 13.18%▲ 3.69 pp |
| DII Holding | 8.64%▼ 0.7 pp | 29.58%▲ 4.76 pp |
| Public Holding | 14.75%▲ 0.37 pp | 57.24%▼ 8.45 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CANARA ROBECO AMC and PINE LABS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.