CRAVATEX vs EFCIL: Stock Comparison
CRAVATEX shows a higher dividend yield, while EFC (I) shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CRAVATEX leads 3; EFCIL leads 4 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Services |
| Industry | — | Diversified Commercial Services |
Price
| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹325 | ₹182 |
| Day Change | 0.32% | -1.72% |
| Volume | 201 | 1.18 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹372.5 | ₹335.85 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹300 | ₹171.42 |
| Distance from 52W High | -12.75% | -45.81% |
Valuation
| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹2,695 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 10.44x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 3.41x |
| EPS | ₹1.7 | ₹18.33 |
| Book Value | ₹462.19 | ₹58.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 4.08% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 38.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 2,130.22% | -65.16% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 6.65% | -82.66% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 28.84% |
| ROCE | — | 26.64% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 20.42% |
| Operating Margin | — | 35.23% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.38x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CRAVATEX | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 74.36% | 56.08% |
| FII Holding | — | 1.26%▼ 0.89 pp |
| DII Holding | — | 8.88%▲ 1.41 pp |
| Public Holding | 25% | 33.79%▼ 0.51 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CRAVATEX and EFC (I).
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.