DYNAMATECH vs GMMPFAUDLR: Stock Comparison
DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES is the larger company by market capitalisation. DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES shows lower leverage and a higher net margin, while GMM PFAUDLER shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
DYNAMATECH leads 4; GMMPFAUDLR leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Industrial Products | Industrial Products |
Price
| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹11,600 | ₹1,215.4 |
| Day Change | -4.79% | -6.23% |
| Volume | 18,229 | 2.09 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹14,498 | ₹1,533.6 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹7,663 | ₹735 |
| Distance from 52W High | -19.99% | -20.75% |
Valuation
| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹7,880 Cr | ₹5,485 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 185.72x | 73.58x |
| P/B Ratio | 9.93x | 4.55x |
| EPS | ₹62.49 | ₹16.58 |
| Book Value | ₹1,168.8 | ₹267.92 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.16% |
Growth
| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 13.8% | 17% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -21.9% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.08% | 4.2% |
| ROCE | 7% | 7.97% |
| Net Margin | 2% | -0.19% |
| Operating Margin | 6.67% | 6.38% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.67x | 0.68x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | DYNAMATECH | GMMPFAUDLR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 41.5% | 25.18% |
| FII Holding | 9.55%▼ 0.71 pp | 13.22%▼ 1.17 pp |
| DII Holding | 16.96%▲ 1.1 pp | 19.15%▲ 0.73 pp |
| Public Holding | 32%▼ 0.39 pp | 42.45%▲ 0.43 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: DYNAMATIC TECHNOLOGIES and GMM PFAUDLER.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.