EFCIL vs MINALIND: Stock Comparison
EFC (I) shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
EFCIL leads 4; MINALIND leads 2 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | — |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | — |
Price
| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹182 | ₹3.63 |
| Day Change | -1.72% | 4.01% |
| Volume | 1.18 L | 6.93 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹335.85 | ₹3.74 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹171.42 | ₹1.71 |
| Distance from 52W High | -45.81% | -2.94% |
Valuation
| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,695 Cr | ₹0 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 10.44x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.41x | — |
| EPS | ₹18.33 | ₹0.05 |
| Book Value | ₹58.86 | ₹3.34 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 38.8% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 5% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -65.16% | 6,707.84% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -82.66% | 817.78% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.84% | — |
| ROCE | 26.64% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.42% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.23% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0.38x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | EFCIL | MINALIND |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 56.08% | 40.79%▲ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 1.26%▼ 0.89 pp | — |
| DII Holding | 8.88%▲ 1.41 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 33.79%▼ 0.51 pp | 59.21%▼ 0.01 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: EFC (I) and MINALIND.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.