EKC vs HIRECT: Stock Comparison
Everest Kanto Cylinder Limited is the larger company by market capitalisation. Everest Kanto Cylinder Limited shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage, while Hind Rectifiers Limited shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
EKC leads 8; HIRECT leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Industrial Products | Industrial Products |
Price
| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹111.38 | ₹1,273.7 |
| Day Change | -1.26% | -0.37% |
| Volume | 1.1 L | 1.06 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹154.55 | ₹1,909.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹90.25 | ₹643.7 |
| Distance from 52W High | -27.93% | -33.31% |
Valuation
| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,24,976.92 L Cr | ₹4,403 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 9.76x | 104.62x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.87x | 20.89x |
| EPS | ₹11.17 | ₹13.1 |
| Book Value | ₹124.74 | ₹60.69 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.11% |
Growth
| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -15.1% | 51.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 244.2% | -54.9% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -15.1% | 51.2% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 150% | -129% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.3% | 21.7% |
| ROCE | 11.6% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.99% | 4.47% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 8.42% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.19x | 1.17x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | EKC | HIRECT |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 67.39% | 42.58%▼ 1.34 pp |
| FII Holding | 1.19%▼ 0.05 pp | 6.84%▲ 0.27 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.29%▲ 0.06 pp | 3.22%▲ 3.02 pp |
| Public Holding | 31.14% | 47.35%▼ 1.96 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Everest Kanto Cylinder Limited and Hind Rectifiers Limited.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.