ELCIDIN vs KAMAHOLD: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. ELCID INVESTMENTS shows a higher net margin, while KAMA HOLDINGS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ELCIDIN leads 5; KAMAHOLD leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | ELCIDIN | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹99,995 | ₹2,137.2 |
| Day Change | 1.26% | 0.81% |
| Volume | 5 | 991 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,37,000 | ₹2,783.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹95,100 | ₹2,062 |
| Distance from 52W High | -27.01% | -23.23% |
Valuation
| Metric | ELCIDIN | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,968 Cr | ₹6,855 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 20.62x | 6.27x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.23x | 0.86x |
| EPS | ₹2,878.35 | ₹119.56 |
| Book Value | ₹4,33,672.47 | ₹4,675.27 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 2.13% |
Growth
| Metric | ELCIDIN | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 66.85% | 8.87% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 81.37% | 30.39% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ELCIDIN | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.25% | 15.48% |
| ROCE | 1.48% | 15.48% |
| Net Margin | 81% | 11.58% |
| Operating Margin | 95.5% | 97.29% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ELCIDIN | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 75% |
| FII Holding | 0%▼ 0.02 pp | 0.24% |
| DII Holding | 0.06%▲ 0.01 pp | 0.03% |
| Public Holding | 24.94% | 24.72% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ELCID INVESTMENTS and KAMA HOLDINGS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.