ENDURANCE vs RML: Stock Comparison
ENDURANCE TECHNO. is the larger company by market capitalisation. ENDURANCE TECHNO. shows faster revenue growth, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while RANE (MADRAS) shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ENDURANCE leads 7; RML leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹2,782.8 | ₹1,295.9 |
| Day Change | 1.02% | 14.95% |
| Volume | 50,285 | 21.95 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹3,079.9 | ₹1,323.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹2,142.8 | ₹608.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -9.65% | -2.11% |
Valuation
| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹39,126 Cr | ₹3,582 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 40.06x | 25.55x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.68x | 4.05x |
| EPS | ₹13.84 | ₹10.89 |
| Book Value | ₹486.33 | ₹271.58 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 1.42% |
Growth
| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 37.9% | -42.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 12.7% | 4.7% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -26.24% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -20.41% | -6.38% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.91% | 14.41% |
| ROCE | 13.64% | 11.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.52% | 2.78% |
| Operating Margin | 9.14% | 5.37% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.19x | 0.82x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ENDURANCE | RML |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 64.04% |
| FII Holding | 12.7%▼ 0.44 pp | 0.33%▲ 0.27 pp |
| DII Holding | 10.06%▲ 0.28 pp | 0.79%▼ 0.19 pp |
| Public Holding | 2.24%▲ 0.16 pp | 28.42%▼ 0.09 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ENDURANCE TECHNO. and RANE (MADRAS).
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.