FRONTSP vs MERCURYEV: Stock Comparison
FRONTIER SPRINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. FRONTIER SPRINGS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
FRONTSP leads 8; MERCURYEV leads 3 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | FRONTSP | MERCURYEV |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,240 | ₹41.86 |
| Day Change | -1.2% | 0.6% |
| Volume | 10,679 | 23.52 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,869 | ₹41.61 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,241.1 | ₹33.9 |
| Distance from 52W High | -33.65% | 0.6% |
Valuation
| Metric | FRONTSP | MERCURYEV |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,466 Cr | ₹793 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.24x | 142.56x |
| P/B Ratio | 8.06x | 2.44x |
| EPS | ₹10.17 | ₹0.09 |
| Book Value | ₹155.28 | ₹14.69 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | FRONTSP | MERCURYEV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -75.64% | 61.52% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -80.41% | 8.13% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | FRONTSP | MERCURYEV |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 33.42% | 1% |
| ROCE | 32.25% | 1.02% |
| Net Margin | 19.04% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.63% | 10.15% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.06x | 0.07x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | FRONTSP | MERCURYEV |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 51.76% | 59.18% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 1.7%▼ 0.74 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.36%▼ 0.15 pp | — |
| Public Holding | 47.88%▲ 0.15 pp | 39.11%▲ 0.74 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: FRONTIER SPRINGS and MERCURY EV-TECH.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.