GLFL vs KAMAHOLD: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. GUJARAT LEASE FINANCING L shows faster revenue growth, while KAMA HOLDINGS shows a higher dividend yield and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GLFL leads 2; KAMAHOLD leads 4 of 6
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | — |
| Industry | Other Financial Services | — |
Price
| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹5.22 | ₹2,273.5 |
| Day Change | -0.76% | -0.5% |
| Volume | 6,271 | 2,654 |
| 52-Week High | ₹8.09 | ₹2,783.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹4.73 | ₹2,280 |
| Distance from 52W High | -35.48% | -18.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹14 Cr | ₹7,285 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 6.66x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0.91x |
| EPS | ₹-0.03 | ₹-0.15 |
| Book Value | — | ₹4,675.27 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 2% |
Growth
| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0.95% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -60.53% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | — | -100% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -241.62% | -100.06% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 15.48% |
| ROCE | — | 15.45% |
| Net Margin | 8.49% | 11.58% |
| Operating Margin | — | 97.29% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GLFL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 45.67% | 75% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0.24% |
| DII Holding | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Public Holding | 54.31% | 24.72% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GUJARAT LEASE FINANCING L and KAMA HOLDINGS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.