GMMPFAUDLR vs MAMATA: Stock Comparison
GMM PFAUDLER is the larger company by market capitalisation. GMM PFAUDLER shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth, while MAMATA MACHINERY shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GMMPFAUDLR leads 9; MAMATA leads 4 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Industrial Products | Industrial Products |
Price
| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,335 | ₹391.55 |
| Day Change | -0.96% | -1.29% |
| Volume | 5.87 L | 56,046 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,384.8 | ₹515 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹735 | ₹297 |
| Distance from 52W High | -3.6% | -23.97% |
Valuation
| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹6,024 Cr | ₹973 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 81.42x | 117.78x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.04x | 5.43x |
| EPS | ₹15.69 | ₹-0.14 |
| Book Value | ₹267.92 | ₹75.21 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.13% |
Growth
| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 17% | -33.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -100% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 292.7% | -11.05% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 98.21% | 89.72% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.2% | 5.7% |
| ROCE | 7.97% | 6.01% |
| Net Margin | -0.19% | 6.46% |
| Operating Margin | 6.38% | 7.7% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.68x | 0.03x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GMMPFAUDLR | MAMATA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 25.18% | 62.45% |
| FII Holding | 14.39%▼ 2.76 pp | 0.35%▲ 0.19 pp |
| DII Holding | 18.42%▲ 0.83 pp | 1.75%▲ 0.09 pp |
| Public Holding | 42.02%▲ 1.93 pp | 35.46%▼ 0.26 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GMM PFAUDLER and MAMATA MACHINERY.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.