GNA vs SUNCLAY: Stock Comparison
SUNDARAM CLAYTON is the larger company by market capitalisation. GNA AXLES shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while SUNDARAM CLAYTON shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GNA leads 6; SUNCLAY leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹517.85 | ₹1,097.4 |
| Day Change | -3.83% | -2.85% |
| Volume | 2.71 L | 4,958 |
| 52-Week High | ₹648 | ₹1,600 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹295 | ₹1,087 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.08% | -31.41% |
Valuation
| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,220 Cr | ₹2,433 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.79x | 9.7x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.21x | 1.88x |
| EPS | ₹8.91 | ₹-26.91 |
| Book Value | ₹233.89 | ₹587.59 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 0.41% |
Growth
| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -10.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 184.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 14.48% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 24.17% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.65% | 19.48% |
| ROCE | 12.14% | 13.13% |
| Net Margin | 7.91% | 12.46% |
| Operating Margin | 11.56% | 21.48% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.18x | 1x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GNA | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 58.47%▼ 7.31 pp | 59.09% |
| FII Holding | 3.37%▲ 1.67 pp | 0.88%▲ 0.45 pp |
| DII Holding | 12.67%▲ 1.08 pp | 20.71%▼ 0.37 pp |
| Public Holding | 25.48%▲ 4.55 pp | 19.32%▼ 0.08 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GNA AXLES and SUNDARAM CLAYTON.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.