GRANDOAK vs KAMAHOLD: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. GRAND OAK CANYONS DIST L shows a lower P/E and a higher net margin, while KAMA HOLDINGS shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GRANDOAK leads 4; KAMAHOLD leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | GRANDOAK | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹35.16 | ₹2,273.5 |
| Day Change | -4.66% | -0.5% |
| Volume | 2,496 | 2,654 |
| 52-Week High | ₹55.76 | ₹2,783.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹24 | ₹2,280 |
| Distance from 52W High | -36.94% | -18.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | GRANDOAK | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,868 Cr | ₹7,285 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 6.66x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.2x | 0.91x |
| EPS | ₹-0.1 | ₹-0.15 |
| Book Value | ₹16.37 | ₹4,675.27 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 2% |
Growth
| Metric | GRANDOAK | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | -100% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -28,627.43% | -100.06% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | GRANDOAK | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.01% | 15.48% |
| ROCE | 0% | 15.45% |
| Net Margin | 35.69% | 11.58% |
| Operating Margin | 37.83% | 97.29% |
| Debt to Equity | 3.12x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GRANDOAK | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 0% | 75% |
| FII Holding | — | 0.24% |
| DII Holding | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Public Holding | 99.98% | 24.72% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GRAND OAK CANYONS DIST L and KAMA HOLDINGS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.