HGINFRA vs LT: Stock Comparison
LARSEN & TOUBRO is the larger company by market capitalisation. H.G.INFRA ENGINEERING shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher net margin, while LARSEN & TOUBRO shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
HGINFRA leads 7; LT leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Construction | Construction |
| Industry | Civil Construction | Civil Construction |
Price
| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹502.15 | ₹4,027 |
| Day Change | 0.05% | -0.27% |
| Volume | 37,937 | 11.61 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,049.95 | ₹4,440 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹429.5 | ₹3,288.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -52.17% | -9.3% |
Valuation
| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3,270 Cr | ₹5,54,06,127.28 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.62x | 33.44x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.01x | 5.08x |
| EPS | ₹4.34 | ₹120.74 |
| Book Value | ₹500.99 | ₹794.47 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.94% |
Growth
| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 4.8% | 11.7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -42.4% | -34.5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -17.57% | -46.98% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 163.51% | -10.68% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.05% | 8.44% |
| ROCE | 8.25% | 9.33% |
| Net Margin | 6.31% | 6.04% |
| Operating Margin | 17.64% | 7.04% |
| Debt to Equity | 1.5x | 0.15x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | HGINFRA | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 71.78% | — |
| FII Holding | 1.38%▼ 0.01 pp | 19.13%▲ 0.35 pp |
| DII Holding | 10.11%▼ 0.55 pp | 43.02%▼ 0.31 pp |
| Public Holding | 16.73%▲ 0.56 pp | 37.6%▼ 0.04 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: H.G.INFRA ENGINEERING and LARSEN & TOUBRO.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.