IEL vs SICALLOG: Stock Comparison
IEL shows a lower P/E, while SICALLOG shows a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
IEL leads 4; SICALLOG leads 3 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | — |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | — |
Price
| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹25.38 | ₹112.53 |
| Day Change | 5.4% | -3.88% |
| Volume | 22.52 L | 1.52 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹21.84 | ₹122.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹18.12 | ₹85.61 |
| Distance from 52W High | 16.21% | -8.14% |
Valuation
| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹769 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 22.05x |
| P/B Ratio | -1.96x | 6.01x |
| EPS | ₹-0.16 | ₹2.3 |
| Book Value | — | ₹33.79 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -18.84% | -46.39% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 46.9% | -13.61% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 25.04% |
| ROCE | -160.9% | 24% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | -253.12% | 61.36% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 1.85x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2025 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | IEL | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 36.24% | 73.5% |
| FII Holding | 0.24%▲ 0.17 pp | 3.09% |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0.11%▲ 0.03 pp |
| Public Holding | 62.56%▼ 0.17 pp | 23.3%▼ 0.03 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: IEL and SICALLOG.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.