INDOMIM vs PERMAGN: Stock Comparison

INDO-MIM vs PERMANENT MAGNETSUpdated 11 Sept 26, 4:08 PM ISTNSE & company filings

PERMANENT MAGNETS shows a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.

Metric snapshot

INDOMIM leads 2; PERMAGN leads 2 of 7

Not a rating

Interactive comparison

Compare the numbers that shape the decision

Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.

INDOMIMPERMAGN

Valuation lens

What price are you paying?

Market CapContext only
₹50,383 Cr
₹0 Cr
EPSINDOMIM has the higher reading
₹4.51
₹4.43
Book ValueContext only
₹183.04
Dividend YieldPERMAGN has the higher reading
0%
0.25%

✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.

Key Differences

EPS
INDOMIM has higher earnings per share
₹4.51 vs ₹4.43
Dividend Yield
PERMAGN has a higher dividend yield
0.25% vs 0%
Qtr Sales Growth
PERMAGN has stronger quarterly sales growth
0% vs -17.69%
Qtr Profit Growth
INDOMIM has stronger quarterly profit growth
-7.06% vs -39.04%

Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.

Price

MetricINDOMIMPERMAGN
Live Price₹1,018.2₹864.65
Day Change1.16%-0.56%
Volume15.65 L1,843
52-Week High₹1,028.5₹929
52-Week Low₹700₹784.05
Distance from 52W High-1%-6.93%

Valuation

MetricINDOMIMPERMAGN
Market Cap₹50,383 Cr₹0 Cr
EPS₹4.51₹4.43
Book Value₹183.04
Dividend Yield0%0.25%

Growth

MetricINDOMIMPERMAGN
Revenue Growth (TTM YoY)0%0%
EPS Growth (TTM YoY)0%0%
Qtr Sales Growth-17.69%0%
Qtr Profit Growth-7.06%-39.04%

Profitability & Leverage

MetricINDOMIMPERMAGN
Net Margin0%0%

Shareholding

As of Jul 2026 • change vs previous quarter
MetricINDOMIMPERMAGN
Promoter Holding1.34%58.01%
FII Holding2.34%0%
DII Holding6.05%0.01%
Public Holding13.95%41.98%

How to Read This Comparison

Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.

Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: INDO-MIM and PERMANENT MAGNETS.

Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.