INDSWFTLTD vs KMCSHIL: Stock Comparison
INDSWFTLTD shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
INDSWFTLTD leads 4; KMCSHIL leads 0 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | — |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | — |
Price
| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹15.76 | ₹155.5 |
| Day Change | 6.13% | 5.83% |
| Volume | 6.45 L | 44.75 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹17.82 | ₹154 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹15.15 | ₹128.48 |
| Distance from 52W High | -11.56% | 0.97% |
Valuation
| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 40.39x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 10.71x |
| EPS | ₹52.33 | ₹1.02 |
| Book Value | — | ₹12.9 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 255.57% | -69.98% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 10.46% | -64.54% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| ROCE | 80.12% | — |
| Net Margin | 55.01% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 63.48% | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2025 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | INDSWFTLTD | KMCSHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 55.58% | 75% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0.02%▲ 0.02 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 44.42% | 24.98%▼ 0.02 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: INDSWFTLTD and K M C SPECIALITY HOSP I L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.