JASH vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
JASH ENGINEERING is the larger company by market capitalisation. JASH ENGINEERING shows lower leverage and a higher net margin, while TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
JASH leads 5; TINNARUBR leads 8 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Industrial Products | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹514.05 | ₹1,034.05 |
| Day Change | -1.42% | 0.53% |
| Volume | 90,550 | 33,404 |
| 52-Week High | ₹572.85 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹327.1 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -10.26% | -21.78% |
Valuation
| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3,242 Cr | ₹1,858 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 37.75x | 30.16x |
| P/B Ratio | 6.25x | 6.19x |
| EPS | ₹2.12 | ₹11.16 |
| Book Value | ₹83.06 | ₹166.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 0.32% |
Growth
| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -3.3% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 58.1% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -34.41% | -3.41% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 163.05% | -2.21% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.1% | 18.16% |
| ROCE | 13.39% | 14.61% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 19.95% | 15.57% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.15x | 0.41x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | JASH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 38.7% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 1.54%▼ 0.24 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.32%▼ 0.07 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 54.91%▲ 0.78 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: JASH ENGINEERING and TINNA RUBBER AND INFR.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.