KAMAHOLD vs VGCL: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. KAMA HOLDINGS shows a higher net margin, while VIBRANT GLOBAL CAPITAL L shows a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KAMAHOLD leads 4; VGCL leads 1 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | VGCL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹2,137.2 | ₹54.55 |
| Day Change | 0.81% | -5.96% |
| Volume | 991 | 722 |
| 52-Week High | ₹2,783.9 | ₹62.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹2,062 | ₹45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -23.23% | -13.34% |
Valuation
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | VGCL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹6,855 Cr | ₹121 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.27x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.86x | — |
| EPS | ₹119.56 | ₹6.48 |
| Book Value | ₹4,675.27 | ₹72.87 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.13% | 4.57% |
Growth
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | VGCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 8.87% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 30.39% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | VGCL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.48% | — |
| ROCE | 15.48% | — |
| Net Margin | 11.58% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 97.29% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KAMAHOLD | VGCL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 71.59%▲ 0.06 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.24% | — |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | — |
| Public Holding | 24.72% | 28.41%▼ 0.06 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: KAMA HOLDINGS and VIBRANT GLOBAL CAPITAL L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.