KDDL vs LYPSAGEMS: Stock Comparison
KDDL shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KDDL leads 10; LYPSAGEMS leads 1 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Durables | Consumer Durables |
| Industry | Gems Jewellery And Watches | Gems Jewellery And Watches |
Price
| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹3,979.4 | ₹4.63 |
| Day Change | -0.75% | 0.87% |
| Volume | 9,710 | 8,652 |
| 52-Week High | ₹4,270 | ₹6.45 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,990 | ₹4.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -6.81% | -28.22% |
Valuation
| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹4,861 Cr | ₹0 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 50.09x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.5x | — |
| EPS | ₹23.87 | ₹-5.18 |
| Book Value | ₹1,559.33 | ₹6.16 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 37% | -72.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 25.7% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 138.37% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | -1,05,466.21% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.95% | 9.53% |
| ROCE | 18.31% | 5.26% |
| Net Margin | 4.09% | -96.55% |
| Operating Margin | 22.33% | 11.62% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.29x | 0.79x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KDDL | LYPSAGEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 45.51%▼ 2 pp | 36.37% |
| FII Holding | 6.7%▼ 1.29 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 5.31%▲ 3.14 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 39.72%▲ 0.14 pp | 63.39% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: KDDL and LYPSAGEMS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.