KISSHT vs KJMCFIN: Stock Comparison
ONEMI TECHNOLOGY SOL shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KISSHT leads 4; KJMCFIN leads 0 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | KISSHT | KJMCFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹328.7 | ₹60.51 |
| Day Change | -1.56% | -1.74% |
| Volume | 15.97 L | 1,605 |
| 52-Week High | ₹351.5 | ₹84.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹190 | ₹51.01 |
| Distance from 52W High | -6.49% | -28.39% |
Valuation
| Metric | KISSHT | KJMCFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹5,526 Cr | ₹0 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.63x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.12x | — |
| EPS | ₹5.64 | ₹3.4 |
| Book Value | ₹79.7 | ₹213.4 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | KISSHT | KJMCFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 210.32% | -9.93% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 83.02% | -8.85% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | KISSHT | KJMCFIN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.48% | — |
| ROCE | 25.02% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.92% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.15% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0.81x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KISSHT | KJMCFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 24.8% | 74.4% |
| FII Holding | 7.64%▲ 2.54 pp | — |
| DII Holding | 19.04%▼ 0.92 pp | 1.37% |
| Public Holding | 48.52%▼ 1.62 pp | 24.24% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ONEMI TECHNOLOGY SOL and K J M C FINANCIAL SERV L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.