KISSHT vs PML: Stock Comparison
ONEMI TECHNOLOGY SOL is the larger company by market capitalisation. ONEMI TECHNOLOGY SOL shows a higher ROE and a higher ROCE, while PAUL MERCHANTS shows lower leverage and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KISSHT leads 3; PML leads 5 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | KISSHT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹318.25 | ₹462.3 |
| Day Change | -0.28% | 0% |
| Volume | 45,342 | 0 |
| 52-Week High | ₹388.15 | ₹645 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹190 | ₹418.05 |
| Distance from 52W High | -18.01% | -28.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | KISSHT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹5,680 Cr | ₹143 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.08x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.26x | — |
| EPS | ₹5.64 | ₹932.11 |
| Book Value | ₹79.7 | ₹2,912.09 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | KISSHT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 2.61% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 3,127.91% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | KISSHT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.48% | 1.01% |
| ROCE | 25.02% | 1.09% |
| Net Margin | 12.92% | 12.96% |
| Operating Margin | 30.15% | 0.95% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.81x | 0.01x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KISSHT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 23.46%▼ 1.34 pp | 74.65% |
| FII Holding | 7.06%▼ 0.58 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 18.51%▼ 0.53 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 50.97%▲ 2.45 pp | 25.35% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ONEMI TECHNOLOGY SOL and PAUL MERCHANTS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.