KJMCFIN vs NIVABUPA: Stock Comparison
NIVA BUPA HEALTH INS CO L shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KJMCFIN leads 1; NIVABUPA leads 3 of 5
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Financial Services |
| Industry | — | General Insurance |
Price
| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹64.37 | ₹80.73 |
| Day Change | 0.42% | -1.91% |
| Volume | 615 | 3.66 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹84.5 | ₹91.4 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹51.01 | ₹67.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -23.82% | -11.67% |
Valuation
| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹14,923 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 116.18x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 4x |
| EPS | ₹3.4 | ₹1.87 |
| Book Value | ₹213.4 | ₹23.73 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 26.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 90.2% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -9.93% | — |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -8.85% | — |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 0% |
| ROCE | — | 0% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 4.34% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.07x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KJMCFIN | NIVABUPA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | — | 0% |
| FII Holding | — | 12.09%▲ 1.49 pp |
| DII Holding | — | 16.17%▼ 0.32 pp |
| Public Holding | — | 16.44%▼ 1.11 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: K J M C FINANCIAL SERV L and NIVA BUPA HEALTH INS CO L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.