LASA vs ZIMLAB: Stock Comparison
ZIM LABORATORIES is the larger company by market capitalisation. LASA shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while ZIM LABORATORIES shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
LASA leads 5; ZIMLAB leads 4 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | Pharmaceuticals |
Price
| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹6.52 | ₹139.22 |
| Day Change | -2.54% | 2.05% |
| Volume | 46,913 | 1.19 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹14.08 | ₹144.49 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹5.67 | ₹59.31 |
| Distance from 52W High | -53.69% | -3.65% |
Valuation
| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹33 Cr | ₹749 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 150.79x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 2.07x |
| EPS | ₹-0.71 | ₹-0.75 |
| Book Value | ₹9.9 | ₹55.31 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -3.36% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -47.01% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | — | 1.21% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 14.06% | -3.65% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -68.7% | 1.97% |
| ROCE | -57.92% | 4.11% |
| Net Margin | -135.6% | 1.56% |
| Operating Margin | -136.12% | 5.72% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.2x | 0.42x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | LASA | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 53.65% | 30.36%▲ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0.03%▲ 0.03 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 1.33%▲ 1.26 pp |
| Public Holding | 46.35% | 68.28%▼ 1.3 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: LASA and ZIM LABORATORIES.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.