LYPSAGEMS vs TBZ: Stock Comparison
LYPSAGEMS shows lower leverage, while TBZ shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
LYPSAGEMS leads 3; TBZ leads 8 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Durables | Consumer Durables |
| Industry | Gems Jewellery And Watches | Gems Jewellery And Watches |
Price
| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹4.63 | ₹665.35 |
| Day Change | 0.87% | 4.99% |
| Volume | 8,652 | 8.81 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹6.45 | ₹665.35 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹4.1 | ₹110.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -28.22% | 0% |
Valuation
| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹3,998 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 20.35x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 4.59x |
| EPS | ₹-5.18 | ₹2.14 |
| Book Value | ₹6.16 | ₹125.6 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.42% |
Growth
| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -72.5% | 56.7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 614.1% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 138.37% | -16.13% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1,05,466.21% | -57.92% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.53% | 24.14% |
| ROCE | 5.26% | 15.93% |
| Net Margin | -96.55% | 6.32% |
| Operating Margin | 11.62% | 10.58% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.79x | 0.94x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | LYPSAGEMS | TBZ |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 36.37% | 74.12% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0.45%▼ 1.02 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0.25%▲ 0.25 pp |
| Public Holding | 63.39% | 25.18%▲ 0.77 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: LYPSAGEMS and TBZ.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.