M&MFIN vs TFL: Stock Comparison
M&M FIN. SERVICES is the larger company by market capitalisation. M&M FIN. SERVICES shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin, while TRANSWARRANTY FIN. shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
M&MFIN leads 7; TFL leads 2 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) |
Price
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹279.85 | ₹11.3 |
| Day Change | -1.81% | -0.96% |
| Volume | 44.34 L | 572 |
| 52-Week High | ₹415 | ₹18.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹253.4 | ₹10.21 |
| Distance from 52W High | -32.57% | -38.92% |
Valuation
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹39,155 Cr | ₹66 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 10.88x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.42x | — |
| EPS | ₹6.54 | ₹-0.02 |
| Book Value | ₹192 | ₹5.2 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 40.3% | 94.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 82.6% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 3.81% | 0.19% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1.81% | 7.77% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.72% | -6.01% |
| ROCE | 9.08% | 2.48% |
| Net Margin | 25.8% | -30.67% |
| Operating Margin | 60.41% | 18.23% |
| Debt to Equity | 2.91x | 0.65x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 52.48%▼ 0.01 pp | 1.07% |
| FII Holding | 9.96%▲ 0.43 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 31.56%▲ 0.07 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 5.97%▼ 0.49 pp | 46.01% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: M&M FIN. SERVICES and TRANSWARRANTY FIN..
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.