M&MFIN vs TFL: Stock Comparison
M&M FIN. SERVICES is the larger company by market capitalisation. M&M FIN. SERVICES shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin, while TRANSWARRANTY FIN. shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
M&MFIN leads 7; TFL leads 2 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) |
Price
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹353.3 | ₹11.99 |
| Day Change | 2.2% | 1.52% |
| Volume | 31.29 L | 56 |
| 52-Week High | ₹415 | ₹18.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹269.5 | ₹10.21 |
| Distance from 52W High | -14.87% | -35.19% |
Valuation
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹48,878 Cr | ₹65 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 15.03x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.83x | — |
| EPS | ₹6.66 | ₹0.01 |
| Book Value | ₹192.03 | ₹5.2 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 40.3% | 94.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 82.6% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 15% | -0.29% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 3.21% | 142.89% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.72% | -15.43% |
| ROCE | 9.08% | -1.94% |
| Net Margin | 25.8% | -30.67% |
| Operating Margin | 60.41% | -6.72% |
| Debt to Equity | 2.91x | 0.77x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | M&MFIN | TFL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 52.49% | 1.07% |
| FII Holding | 9.53%▲ 0.13 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 31.49%▼ 0.6 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 6.46%▲ 0.47 pp | 46.01% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: M&M FIN. SERVICES and TRANSWARRANTY FIN..
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.