MMFL vs UNOMINDA: Stock Comparison
UNO MINDA is the larger company by market capitalisation. MM FORGINGS shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and a higher net margin, while UNO MINDA shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
MMFL leads 7; UNOMINDA leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹614.15 | ₹1,227.6 |
| Day Change | -2.29% | -4.39% |
| Volume | 26,403 | 5.41 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹687.95 | ₹1,382 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹294.6 | ₹994 |
| Distance from 52W High | -10.73% | -11.17% |
Valuation
| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,969 Cr | ₹70,844 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.96x | 59.53x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.11x | 10.48x |
| EPS | ₹18.98 | ₹5.12 |
| Book Value | ₹202.59 | ₹125.73 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 0.21% |
Growth
| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 15.9% | 17.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 34.1% | 22.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -0.19% | 37.91% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 1.37% | 29.08% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.04% | 17.69% |
| ROCE | 9.69% | 12.62% |
| Net Margin | 6.24% | 6.09% |
| Operating Margin | 13.47% | 7.91% |
| Debt to Equity | 1.04x | 0.35x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | MMFL | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 56.34% | 68.36%▼ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 2.44%▲ 0.58 pp | 8.15%▼ 0.81 pp |
| DII Holding | 7.49%▼ 0.88 pp | 17.53%▲ 0.64 pp |
| Public Holding | 33.73%▲ 0.29 pp | 5.96%▲ 0.17 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: MM FORGINGS and UNO MINDA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.