PERMAGN vs SHILGRAVQ: Stock Comparison
PERMANENT MAGNETS is the larger company by market capitalisation. SHILP GRAVURES shows a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
PERMAGN leads 3; SHILGRAVQ leads 1 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | PERMAGN | SHILGRAVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,010.85 | ₹131.43 |
| Day Change | -4.98% | -0.02% |
| Volume | 4,923 | 174 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,145 | ₹179.7 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹784.05 | ₹125.25 |
| Distance from 52W High | -11.72% | -26.86% |
Valuation
| Metric | PERMAGN | SHILGRAVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹891 Cr | ₹81 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 51.42x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.41x | — |
| EPS | ₹8.73 | ₹5.45 |
| Book Value | ₹183.04 | ₹170.63 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.6% |
Growth
| Metric | PERMAGN | SHILGRAVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 14.6% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 97.11% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | PERMAGN | SHILGRAVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Net Margin | 0% | 0% |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | PERMAGN | SHILGRAVQ |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 58.01% | 60.83% |
| FII Holding | 0% | — |
| DII Holding | 0.01% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 41.98% | 39.17% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: PERMANENT MAGNETS and SHILP GRAVURES.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.