RMC vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
TINNA RUBBER AND INFR is the larger company by market capitalisation. RMC SWITCHGEARS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher ROCE, while TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
RMC leads 6; TINNARUBR leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹211.68 | ₹1,034.05 |
| Day Change | -1.98% | 0.53% |
| Volume | 29,563 | 33,404 |
| 52-Week High | ₹372 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹211.35 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -43.1% | -21.78% |
Valuation
| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹225 Cr | ₹1,858 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 12.39x | 30.16x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.12x | 6.19x |
| EPS | ₹1.97 | ₹11.16 |
| Book Value | ₹123.51 | ₹166.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.32% |
Growth
| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 16.94% | -3.41% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 81.73% | -2.21% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.37% | 18.16% |
| ROCE | 20.96% | 14.61% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 11.84% | 15.57% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.79x | 0.41x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | RMC | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 51.97% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 2.7%▲ 0.01 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.48%▲ 0.09 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 44.85%▼ 0.1 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: RMC SWITCHGEARS and TINNA RUBBER AND INFR.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.