SEMAC vs SRM: Stock Comparison
SRM CONTRACTORS shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SEMAC leads 0; SRM leads 8 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Construction | Construction |
| Industry | Civil Construction | Civil Construction |
Price
| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹225.68 | ₹413.9 |
| Day Change | 0% | -1.56% |
| Volume | 0 | 9,855 |
| 52-Week High | ₹419.3 | ₹649.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹203 | ₹339.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -46.18% | -36.32% |
Valuation
| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹955 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 8.23x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 2.62x |
| EPS | ₹1.65 | ₹8.59 |
| Book Value | ₹278.84 | ₹179.96 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -6.39% | 95.9% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 126.6% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.23% | 26.89% |
| ROCE | 12.85% | 26.03% |
| Net Margin | 3% | 10.83% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 15.65% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.36x | 0.32x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SEMAC | SRM |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 62.85% | 72.59% |
| FII Holding | 0.04% | 0.06%▼ 0.03 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0.38%▲ 0.13 pp |
| Public Holding | 37.1% | 26.97%▼ 0.1 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SEMAC CONSTRUCTION and SRM CONTRACTORS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.