SHILCTECH vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
SHILCHAR TECHNOLOGIES is the larger company by market capitalisation. SHILCHAR TECHNOLOGIES shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SHILCTECH leads 6; TINNARUBR leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹4,174.4 | ₹1,034.05 |
| Day Change | 0.38% | 0.53% |
| Volume | 17,556 | 33,404 |
| 52-Week High | ₹5,399 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹2,852.5 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -22.68% | -21.78% |
Valuation
| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹4,789 Cr | ₹1,858 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 34.82x | 30.16x |
| P/B Ratio | 9.76x | 6.19x |
| EPS | ₹18.24 | ₹11.16 |
| Book Value | ₹429.05 | ₹166.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.32% |
Growth
| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -79.35% | -3.41% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -86.81% | -2.21% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 32.22% | 18.16% |
| ROCE | 34.29% | 14.61% |
| Net Margin | 24.26% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 32.59% | 15.57% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.41x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SHILCTECH | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 62.12% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 2.57%▲ 0.02 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 1.95%▲ 0.04 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 33.37%▼ 0.06 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SHILCHAR TECHNOLOGIES and TINNA RUBBER AND INFR.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.