SIKA vs SPELS: Stock Comparison
SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L is the larger company by market capitalisation. SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L shows a higher dividend yield and a higher net margin, while SPELS shows a lower P/E. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SIKA leads 6; SPELS leads 1 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | SIKA | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹853.7 | ₹145.65 |
| Day Change | -2.5% | -0.65% |
| Volume | 2,874 | 22,324 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,359.4 | ₹157 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹814.1 | ₹140.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -37.2% | -7.23% |
Valuation
| Metric | SIKA | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,811 Cr | ₹470 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 53.52x | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | 11.93x | 171.14x |
| EPS | ₹3.96 | ₹-0.29 |
| Book Value | ₹73.37 | ₹0.66 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | SIKA | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 3.7% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 7.39% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SIKA | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.53% | — |
| ROCE | 24.06% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.25% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.31% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SIKA | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 71.72% | 3.2% |
| FII Holding | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp | 0.02% |
| DII Holding | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| Public Holding | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp | 40.79% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L and SPELS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.