SIKA vs TMCV: Stock Comparison
TATA MOTORS is the larger company by market capitalisation. SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L shows lower leverage and a higher net margin, while TATA MOTORS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SIKA leads 3; TMCV leads 8 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | SIKA | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,085.55 | ₹434.55 |
| Day Change | 5.92% | -1.07% |
| Volume | 6.55 L | 71.09 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,359.4 | ₹509 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹870.1 | ₹317.75 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.14% | -14.63% |
Valuation
| Metric | SIKA | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,302 Cr | ₹1.6 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 66.42x | 38.17x |
| P/B Ratio | 14.8x | 12.56x |
| EPS | ₹4 | ₹6.95 |
| Book Value | ₹73.37 | ₹34.58 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 0.92% |
Growth
| Metric | SIKA | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 6.92% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0.87% | 67.28% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SIKA | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.53% | 56.32% |
| ROCE | 24.06% | 67.49% |
| Net Margin | 17.25% | 3.61% |
| Operating Margin | 23.31% | 10.28% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.38x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SIKA | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 71.72% | 42.56% |
| FII Holding | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp | 18.58%▼ 0.45 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.04% | 18.45%▲ 0.61 pp |
| Public Holding | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp | 20.35%▼ 0.17 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L and TATA MOTORS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.