SPELS vs TIRUPATIFL: Stock Comparison
SPELS shows faster revenue growth, while TIRUPATIFL shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SPELS leads 2; TIRUPATIFL leads 4 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Castings & Forgings |
Price
| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹145.65 | ₹77.48 |
| Day Change | -0.65% | -4.99% |
| Volume | 22,324 | 13.45 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹157 | ₹83.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹140.1 | ₹30.11 |
| Distance from 52W High | -7.23% | -7.65% |
Valuation
| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹902 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 144.08x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 6.7x |
| EPS | ₹-0.29 | ₹0.09 |
| Book Value | ₹0.66 | ₹10.33 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -4% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -39.53% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -96.34% | -76.55% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -274.04% | -80.64% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 4.72% |
| ROCE | — | 5.28% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 3.87% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.14% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.26x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SPELS | TIRUPATIFL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 3.2% | 49.42%▼ 0.33 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.02% | 0.76%▲ 0.31 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.02% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 40.79% | 49.82%▲ 0.02 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SPELS and TIRUPATIFL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.