SUNCLAY vs UNOMINDA: Stock Comparison
Sundaram Clayton Limited vs UNO Minda Limited
Live data: 21 July 2026, 4:08 PM IST • Source: NSE and company filings
UNO Minda Limited is the larger company by market capitalisation. Sundaram Clayton Limited shows a lower P/E, lower leverage and a higher net margin, while UNO Minda Limited shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Side-by-side comparison of Sundaram Clayton Limited and UNO Minda Limited on live price, valuation, growth, profitability, leverage and quarterly shareholding. Highlighted values mark the more favourable of the two on that metric's usual reading; a single metric is never the full story.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,352.5 | ₹1,147.4 |
| Day Change | -2.52% | -0.61% |
| Volume | 2,101 | 5.41 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹2,021.6 | ₹1,382 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,112.8 | ₹994 |
| Distance from 52W High | -33.1% | -16.98% |
Valuation
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3,010 Cr | ₹66,239 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 11.9x | 55.43x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.32x | 9.71x |
| EPS | ₹114.47 | ₹20.71 |
| Book Value | ₹587.6 | ₹108.18 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.36% |
Growth
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -10.5% | 17.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 184.3% | 22.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -11.7% | 17.8% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -44.4% | 22.4% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -17% | 19.2% |
| ROCE | -3.34% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.46% | 6.09% |
| Operating Margin | 5.23% | 7.87% |
| Debt to Equity | 1x | 37.74x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.09% | 68.37%▼ 0.04 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.88%▲ 0.45 pp | 8.96%▼ 0.86 pp |
| DII Holding | 20.71%▼ 0.37 pp | 16.89%▲ 0.91 pp |
| Public Holding | 19.32%▼ 0.08 pp | 5.79% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Sundaram Clayton Limited and UNO Minda Limited.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.