SUNCLAY vs UNOMINDA: Stock Comparison
UNO MINDA is the larger company by market capitalisation. SUNDARAM CLAYTON shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield, while UNO MINDA shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SUNCLAY leads 8; UNOMINDA leads 3 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,097.4 | ₹1,087.4 |
| Day Change | -2.85% | -1.86% |
| Volume | 4,958 | 1.69 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,600 | ₹1,355 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,087 | ₹994 |
| Distance from 52W High | -31.41% | -19.75% |
Valuation
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,433 Cr | ₹62,800 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 9.7x | 52.21x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.88x | 9.19x |
| EPS | ₹-26.91 | ₹5.12 |
| Book Value | ₹587.59 | ₹125.73 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.24% |
Growth
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -10.5% | 17.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 184.3% | 22.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.48% | 17.69% |
| ROCE | 13.13% | 12.36% |
| Net Margin | 12.46% | 6.09% |
| Operating Margin | 21.48% | 7.91% |
| Debt to Equity | 1x | 0.35x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SUNCLAY | UNOMINDA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.09% | 68.36%▼ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.88%▲ 0.45 pp | 8.15%▼ 0.81 pp |
| DII Holding | 20.71%▼ 0.37 pp | 17.53%▲ 0.64 pp |
| Public Holding | 19.32%▼ 0.08 pp | 5.96%▲ 0.17 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: SUNDARAM CLAYTON and UNO MINDA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.