TARMAT vs TICL: Stock Comparison
TARMAT is the larger company by market capitalisation. TARMAT shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and faster revenue growth, while TWAMEV CONS AND INFRA shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
TARMAT leads 8; TICL leads 2 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Construction | Construction |
| Industry | Civil Construction | Civil Construction |
Price
| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹53.39 | ₹6.43 |
| Day Change | 0.04% | 3.88% |
| Volume | 1,808 | 9,939 |
| 52-Week High | ₹73.9 | ₹33.99 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹46.26 | ₹6.01 |
| Distance from 52W High | -27.75% | -81.08% |
Valuation
| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹137 Cr | ₹101 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 36.07x | 40.86x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.78x | 1x |
| EPS | ₹0.61 | ₹0.03 |
| Book Value | ₹74.49 | ₹20.09 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 12.4% | -54.7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 521.1% | -96.8% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.51% | 2.46% |
| ROCE | 3.96% | 1.26% |
| Net Margin | 5.32% | 11.31% |
| Operating Margin | 6.12% | 12.36% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.08x | 1.14x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | TARMAT | TICL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 29.11%▲ 0.06 pp | 71.98%▼ 11.07 pp |
| FII Holding | 1.81%▲ 0.01 pp | 0.17%▲ 0.07 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 69.08%▼ 0.07 pp | 27.85%▲ 11 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: TARMAT and TWAMEV CONS AND INFRA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.