TINNARUBR vs WORTHPERI: Stock Comparison
TINNA RUBBER AND INFR is the larger company by market capitalisation. TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and a higher ROCE, while WORTH PERIPHERALS shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
TINNARUBR leads 8; WORTHPERI leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Rubber | Packaging |
Price
| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹820.05 | ₹155.6 |
| Day Change | -0.69% | 0% |
| Volume | 536 | 48 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,322 | ₹175 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹527.45 | ₹109 |
| Distance from 52W High | -37.97% | -11.09% |
Valuation
| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,481 Cr | ₹239 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 22.12x | 14.97x |
| P/B Ratio | 4.45x | 1.31x |
| EPS | ₹9.46 | ₹2.65 |
| Book Value | ₹166.76 | ₹129.92 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.66% |
Growth
| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 21.6% | 7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 36.4% | -30.9% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0.26% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -17.15% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.16% | 9.24% |
| ROCE | 14.61% | 9.46% |
| Net Margin | 9.68% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.57% | 10.82% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.41x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | TINNARUBR | WORTHPERI |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 67.22% | 68.22%▲ 0.02 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.99%▲ 0.51 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 3.09%▼ 1.09 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 28.38%▲ 0.58 pp | 31.78%▼ 0.02 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: TINNA RUBBER AND INFR and WORTH PERIPHERALS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.