UNOMINDA vs URAVIDEF: Stock Comparison
UNO MINDA is the larger company by market capitalisation. UNO MINDA shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth, while URAVIDEF shows a lower P/E. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
UNOMINDA leads 10; URAVIDEF leads 3 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,227.1 | ₹131.86 |
| Day Change | -4.43% | 1.31% |
| Volume | 5.4 L | 4.16 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,382 | ₹310 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹994 | ₹108.03 |
| Distance from 52W High | -11.21% | -57.46% |
Valuation
| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹70,844 Cr | ₹125 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 59.53x | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | 10.48x | 0x |
| EPS | ₹5.12 | ₹0.62 |
| Book Value | ₹125.73 | ₹44.61 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 17.8% | -13.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 22.3% | -33.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 37.91% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 29.08% | 146.3% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.69% | 2.19% |
| ROCE | 12.62% | 1.31% |
| Net Margin | 6.09% | 3.39% |
| Operating Margin | 7.91% | 5.46% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.35x | 0.46x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | UNOMINDA | URAVIDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 68.36%▼ 0.01 pp | 45.01%▼ 13.03 pp |
| FII Holding | 8.15%▼ 0.81 pp | 6.74% |
| DII Holding | 17.53%▲ 0.64 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 5.96%▲ 0.17 pp | 48.26%▲ 13.04 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: UNO MINDA and URAVIDEF.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.