ETERNAL vs HDFCBANK: Stock Comparison
HDFC BANK is the larger company by market capitalisation. ETERNAL - ZOMATO shows faster revenue growth, while HDFC BANK shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ETERNAL leads 2; HDFCBANK leads 9 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | E-Retail/ E-Commerce | Private Sector Bank |
Price
| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹317.4 | ₹692.8 |
| Day Change | 4.25% | -0.18% |
| Volume | 5.51 Cr | 1.9 Cr |
| 52-Week High | ₹344.4 | ₹1,020.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹212.6 | ₹681.9 |
| Distance from 52W High | -7.84% | -32.11% |
Valuation
| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3.06 L Cr | ₹10.67 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 621.57x | 13.3x |
| P/B Ratio | 9.78x | 1.77x |
| EPS | ₹0.1 | ₹13.43 |
| Book Value | ₹32.1 | ₹356.75 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 1.88% |
Growth
| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 196.5% | -1.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 375% | 7.5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | — |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 1.56% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.18% | 13.62% |
| ROCE | 2.56% | 8.86% |
| Net Margin | 0.73% | 25.12% |
| Operating Margin | 1.85% | 19.97% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 1.01x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ETERNAL | HDFCBANK |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | — | 0% |
| FII Holding | 33.01%▲ 3.93 pp | 39.4%▼ 2.43 pp |
| DII Holding | 36.22%▼ 3.1 pp | 43.63%▲ 1.71 pp |
| Public Holding | 26.24%▼ 0.75 pp | 16.97%▲ 0.72 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ETERNAL - ZOMATO and HDFC BANK.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.