ETERNAL vs SBILIFE: Stock Comparison
ETERNAL - ZOMATO is the larger company by market capitalisation. ETERNAL - ZOMATO shows faster revenue growth, while SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ETERNAL leads 2; SBILIFE leads 7 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | E-Retail/ E-Commerce | Life Insurance |
Price
| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹329 | ₹1,750 |
| Day Change | 2.56% | 2.37% |
| Volume | 2.71 Cr | 9.42 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹368.45 | ₹2,132 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹212.6 | ₹1,652.9 |
| Distance from 52W High | -10.71% | -17.92% |
Valuation
| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3.17 L Cr | ₹1.76 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 729x | 67.64x |
| P/B Ratio | 10.22x | 9.22x |
| EPS | ₹0.61 | ₹25.92 |
| Book Value | ₹32.1 | ₹200.67 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.16% |
Growth
| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 196.5% | -82.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 375% | -1.1% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -83.43% | — |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 535.87% | — |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.18% | 12.94% |
| ROCE | 2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.73% | 2.48% |
| Operating Margin | 1.85% | 2.25% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ETERNAL | SBILIFE |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 4.61% | 55.32%▼ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 29.08%▼ 3.53 pp | 20.95%▼ 0.56 pp |
| DII Holding | 39.32%▲ 3.33 pp | 19.66%▲ 0.53 pp |
| Public Holding | 26.99%▲ 0.32 pp | 4.06%▲ 0.04 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ETERNAL - ZOMATO and SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.