GNA vs PPAP: Stock Comparison
GNA AXLES is the larger company by market capitalisation. GNA AXLES shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while PPAP shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GNA leads 8; PPAP leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹517.85 | ₹338.02 |
| Day Change | -3.83% | -9.17% |
| Volume | 2.71 L | 5.3 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹648 | ₹379.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹295 | ₹176 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.08% | -10.93% |
Valuation
| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,220 Cr | ₹325 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 16.79x | 7.68x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.21x | 1.04x |
| EPS | ₹8.91 | ₹0.61 |
| Book Value | ₹233.89 | ₹241.02 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 1.09% |
Growth
| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 18.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 1,771.2% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 14.48% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 24.17% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.65% | 9.38% |
| ROCE | 12.14% | 8.49% |
| Net Margin | 7.91% | 7.62% |
| Operating Margin | 11.56% | 10.86% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.18x | 0.53x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GNA | PPAP |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 58.47%▼ 7.31 pp | 64.3% |
| FII Holding | 3.37%▲ 1.67 pp | 5.66%▼ 0.18 pp |
| DII Holding | 12.67%▲ 1.08 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 25.48%▲ 4.55 pp | 30.03%▲ 0.17 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GNA AXLES and PPAP.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.