TFL vs UGROCAP: Stock Comparison
UGRO CAPITAL is the larger company by market capitalisation. TRANSWARRANTY FIN. shows faster revenue growth, while UGRO CAPITAL shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
TFL leads 4; UGROCAP leads 5 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) |
Price
| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹11.99 | ₹83.74 |
| Day Change | 1.52% | 0.3% |
| Volume | 56 | 98,903 |
| 52-Week High | ₹18.5 | ₹192.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹10.21 | ₹80.12 |
| Distance from 52W High | -35.19% | -56.5% |
Valuation
| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹65 Cr | ₹1,302 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 7.8x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0.45x |
| EPS | ₹0.01 | ₹3.91 |
| Book Value | ₹5.2 | ₹187.14 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 94.2% | 56% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -17.5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -0.29% | -16.01% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 142.89% | -10.54% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -15.43% | 3.99% |
| ROCE | -1.94% | 9.6% |
| Net Margin | -30.67% | 11.86% |
| Operating Margin | -6.72% | 60.2% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.77x | 2.19x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | TFL | UGROCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 1.07% | 2.88%▲ 0.89 pp |
| FII Holding | 0% | 5.45%▼ 16.88 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 1.85%▲ 0.17 pp |
| Public Holding | 46.01% | 88.23%▲ 15.83 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: TRANSWARRANTY FIN. and UGRO CAPITAL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.